<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rubbish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interfunt.com/funtlery/28/rubbish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interfunt.com/funtlery/28/rubbish/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:40:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyles</title>
		<link>http://interfunt.com/funtlery/28/rubbish/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interfunt.com/?p=28#comment-122</guid>
		<description>pe·dan·tic      /pəˈdæntɪk/  
–adjective

1.	ostentatious in one&#039;s learning.
2.	overly concerned with minute details or formalisms, esp. in     
teaching.

;-)

(You&#039;re right of course, but I normally have my editor deal with these minor matters of spelling and suchlike...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pe·dan·tic      /pəˈdæntɪk/<br />
–adjective</p>
<p>1.	ostentatious in one&#8217;s learning.<br />
2.	overly concerned with minute details or formalisms, esp. in<br />
teaching.<br />
 <img src='http://interfunt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(You&#8217;re right of course, but I normally have my editor deal with these minor matters of spelling and suchlike&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodti</title>
		<link>http://interfunt.com/funtlery/28/rubbish/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>rodti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interfunt.com/?p=28#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t that be &#039;confectionery&#039;, pertaining to confections as a whole as opposed to a single item of &#039;confectionary&#039;?  I get myself terribly confused with this one, and Fowler&#039;s is of no use whatsoever on this particular subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t that be &#8216;confectionery&#8217;, pertaining to confections as a whole as opposed to a single item of &#8216;confectionary&#8217;?  I get myself terribly confused with this one, and Fowler&#8217;s is of no use whatsoever on this particular subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyles Brandreth</title>
		<link>http://interfunt.com/funtlery/28/rubbish/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyles Brandreth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interfunt.com/?p=28#comment-119</guid>
		<description>This puts me in mind of Wrigley&#039;s Orbit Professional chewing gum. I&#039;m always puzzled as to whether this is a product aimed at those who have taken mastication &#039;to the next level&#039;, as it were, or a gum that has itself striven and progressed through the ranks of amateur and intermediate confectionary to emerge clutching a briefcase and roaring down the phone at its subordinates. The mind boggles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This puts me in mind of Wrigley&#8217;s Orbit Professional chewing gum. I&#8217;m always puzzled as to whether this is a product aimed at those who have taken mastication &#8216;to the next level&#8217;, as it were, or a gum that has itself striven and progressed through the ranks of amateur and intermediate confectionary to emerge clutching a briefcase and roaring down the phone at its subordinates. The mind boggles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
